EXAM DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE GUIDE & DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE EXAM ASSESSMENT

Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Assessment

Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Assessment

Blog Article

Tags: Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Assessment, Valid Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Blueprint, Reliable Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Real Exam, Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Review

We have special online worker to solve all your problems. Once you have questions about our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate latest exam guide, you can directly contact with them through email. We are 7*24*365 online service. We are welcome you to contact us any time via email or online service. We have issued numerous products, so you might feel confused about which Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study dumps suit you best. You will get satisfied answers after consultation. Our online workers are going through professional training. Your demands and thought can be clearly understood by them. Even if you have bought our high-pass-rate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training practice but you do not know how to install it, we can offer remote guidance to assist you finish installation. In the process of using, you still have access to our after sales service. All in all, we will keep helping you until you have passed the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam and got the certificate.

It is known to us that our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials have been keeping a high pass rate all the time. There is no doubt that it must be due to the high quality of our study materials. It is a matter of common sense that pass rate is the most important standard to testify the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials. The high pass rate of our study materials means that our products are very effective and useful for all people to pass their exam and get the related certification. So if you buy the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials from our company, you will get the certification in a shorter time.

>> Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide <<

2025 Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide 100% Pass | Trustable Databricks Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Exam Assessment Pass for sure

our Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate actual exam has won thousands of people's support. All of them have passed the exam and got the certificate. They live a better life now. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study guide can release your stress of preparation for the test. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Engine is professional, which can help you pass the exam for the first time.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q55-Q60):

NEW QUESTION # 55
A Generative Al Engineer is creating an LLM-based application. The documents for its retriever have been chunked to a maximum of 512 tokens each. The Generative Al Engineer knows that cost and latency are more important than quality for this application. They have several context length levels to choose from.
Which will fulfill their need?

  • A. context length 32768: smallest model is 14GB and embedding dimension 4096
  • B. context length 514; smallest model is 0.44GB and embedding dimension 768
  • C. context length 512: smallest model is 0.13GB and embedding dimension 384
  • D. context length 2048: smallest model is 11GB and embedding dimension 2560

Answer: C

Explanation:
When prioritizing cost and latency over quality in a Large Language Model (LLM)-based application, it is crucial to select a configuration that minimizes both computational resources and latency while still providing reasonable performance. Here's whyDis the best choice:
* Context length: The context length of 512 tokens aligns with the chunk size used for the documents (maximum of 512 tokens per chunk). This is sufficient for capturing the needed information and generating responses without unnecessary overhead.
* Smallest model size: The model with a size of 0.13GB is significantly smaller than the other options.
This small footprint ensures faster inference times and lower memory usage, which directly reduces both latency and cost.
* Embedding dimension: While the embedding dimension of 384 is smaller than the other options, it is still adequate for tasks where cost and speed are more important than precision and depth of understanding.
This setup achieves the desired balance between cost-efficiency and reasonable performance in a latency- sensitive, cost-conscious application.


NEW QUESTION # 56
A Generative Al Engineer needs to design an LLM pipeline to conduct multi-stage reasoning that leverages external tools. To be effective at this, the LLM will need to plan and adapt actions while performing complex reasoning tasks.
Which approach will do this?

  • A. Implement a framework like ReAct which allows the LLM to generate reasoning traces and perform task-specific actions that leverage external tools if necessary.
  • B. Use a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique to guide the LLM through a series of reasoning steps, then manually input the results from external tools for the final answer.
  • C. Tram the LLM to generate a single, comprehensive response without interacting with any external tools, relying solely on its pre-trained knowledge.
  • D. Encourage the LLM to make multiple API calls in sequence without planning or structuring the calls, allowing the LLM to decide when and how to use external tools spontaneously.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task requires an LLM pipeline for multi-stage reasoning with external tools, necessitating planning, adaptability, and complex reasoning. Let's evaluate the options based on Databricks' recommendations for advanced LLM workflows.
* Option A: Train the LLM to generate a single, comprehensive response without interacting with any external tools, relying solely on its pre-trained knowledge
* This approach limits the LLM to its static knowledge base, excluding external tools and multi- stage reasoning. It can't adapt or plan actions dynamically, failing the requirements.
* Databricks Reference:"External tools enhance LLM capabilities beyond pre-trained knowledge" ("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Implement a framework like ReAct which allows the LLM to generate reasoning traces and perform task-specific actions that leverage external tools if necessary
* ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) combines reasoning traces (step-by-step logic) with actions (e.g., tool calls), enabling the LLM to plan, adapt, and execute complex tasks iteratively. This meets all requirements: multi-stage reasoning, tool use, and adaptability.
* Databricks Reference:"Frameworks like ReAct enable LLMs to interleave reasoning and external tool interactions for complex problem-solving"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option C: Encourage the LLM to make multiple API calls in sequence without planning or structuring the calls, allowing the LLM to decide when and how to use external tools spontaneously
* Unstructured, spontaneous API calls lack planning and may lead to inefficient or incorrect tool usage. This doesn't ensure effective multi-stage reasoning or adaptability.
* Databricks Reference: Structured frameworks are preferred:"Ad-hoc tool calls can reduce reliability in complex tasks"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
* Option D: Use a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique to guide the LLM through a series of reasoning steps, then manually input the results from external tools for the final answer
* CoT improves reasoning but relies on manual tool interaction, breaking automation and adaptability. It's not a scalable pipeline solution.
* Databricks Reference:"Manual intervention is impractical for production LLM pipelines" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
Conclusion: Option B (ReAct) is the best approach, as it integrates reasoning and tool use in a structured, adaptive framework, aligning with Databricks' guidance for complex LLM workflows.


NEW QUESTION # 57
A Generative Al Engineer is helping a cinema extend its website's chat bot to be able to respond to questions about specific showtimes for movies currently playing at their local theater. They already have the location of the user provided by location services to their agent, and a Delta table which is continually updated with the latest showtime information by location. They want to implement this new capability In their RAG application.
Which option will do this with the least effort and in the most performant way?

  • A. Set up a task in Databricks Workflows to write the information in the Delta table periodically to an external database such as MySQL and query the information from there as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.
  • B. Create a Feature Serving Endpoint from a FeatureSpec that references an online store synced from the Delta table. Query the Feature Serving Endpoint as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.
  • C. implementation. Write the Delta table contents to a text column.then embed those texts using an embedding model and store these in the vector index Look up the information based on the embedding as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.
  • D. Query the Delta table directly via a SQL query constructed from the user's input using a text-to-SQL LLM in the agent logic / tool

Answer: B

Explanation:
The task is to extend a cinema chatbot to provide movie showtime information using a RAG application, leveraging user location and a continuously updated Delta table, with minimal effort and high performance.
Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Create a Feature Serving Endpoint from a FeatureSpec that references an online store synced from the Delta table. Query the Feature Serving Endpoint as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Databricks Feature Serving provides low-latency access to real-time data from Delta tables via an online store. Syncing the Delta table to a Feature Serving Endpoint allows the chatbot to query showtimes efficiently, integrating seamlessly into the RAG agent'stool logic. This leverages Databricks' native infrastructure, minimizing effort and ensuring performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Feature Serving Endpoints provide real-time access to Delta table data with low latency, ideal for production systems"("Databricks Feature Engineering Guide," 2023).
* Option B: Query the Delta table directly via a SQL query constructed from the user's input using a text-to-SQL LLM in the agent logic / tool
* Using a text-to-SQL LLM to generate queries adds complexity (e.g., ensuring accurate SQL generation) and latency (LLM inference + SQL execution). While feasible, it's less performant and requires more effort than a pre-built serving solution.
* Databricks Reference:"Direct SQL queries are flexible but may introduce overhead in real-time applications"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Write the Delta table contents to a text column, then embed those texts using an embedding model and store these in the vector index. Look up the information based on the embedding as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Converting structured Delta table data (e.g., showtimes) into text, embedding it, and using vector search is inefficient for structured lookups. It's effort-intensive (preprocessing, embedding) and less precise than direct queries, undermining performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector search excels for unstructured data, not structured tabular lookups"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option D: Set up a task in Databricks Workflows to write the information in the Delta table periodically to an external database such as MySQL and query the information from there as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Exporting to an external database (e.g., MySQL) adds setup effort (workflow, external DB management) and latency (periodic updates vs. real-time). It's less performant and more complex than using Databricks' native tools.
* Databricks Reference:"Avoid external systems when Delta tables provide real-time data natively"("Databricks Workflows Guide").
Conclusion: Option A minimizes effort by using Databricks Feature Serving for real-time, low-latency access to the Delta table, ensuring high performance in a production-ready RAG chatbot.


NEW QUESTION # 58
A Generative Al Engineer is building an LLM-based application that has an important transcription (speech-to-text) task. Speed is essential for the success of the application Which open Generative Al models should be used?

  • A. L!ama-2-70b-chat-hf
  • B. MPT-30B-lnstruct
  • C. DBRX
  • D. whisper-large-v3 (1.6B)

Answer: D

Explanation:
The task requires an open generative AI model for a transcription (speech-to-text) task where speed is essential. Let's assess the options based on their suitability for transcription and performance characteristics, referencing Databricks' approach to model selection.
* Option A: Llama-2-70b-chat-hf
* Llama-2 is a text-based LLM optimized for chat and text generation, not speech-to-text. It lacks transcription capabilities.
* Databricks Reference:"Llama models are designed for natural language generation, not audio processing"("Databricks Model Catalog").
* Option B: MPT-30B-Instruct
* MPT-30B is another text-based LLM focused on instruction-following and text generation, not transcription. It's irrelevant for speech-to-text tasks.
* Databricks Reference: No specific mention, but MPT is categorized under text LLMs in Databricks' ecosystem, not audio models.
* Option C: DBRX
* DBRX, developed by Databricks, is a powerful text-based LLM for general-purpose generation.
It doesn't natively support speech-to-text and isn't optimized for transcription.
* Databricks Reference:"DBRX excels at text generation and reasoning tasks"("Introducing DBRX," 2023)-no mention of audio capabilities.
* Option D: whisper-large-v3 (1.6B)
* Whisper, developed by OpenAI, is an open-source model specifically designed for speech-to-text transcription. The "large-v3" variant (1.6 billion parameters) balances accuracy and efficiency, with optimizations for speed via quantization or deployment on GPUs-key for the application's requirements.
* Databricks Reference:"For audio transcription, models like Whisper are recommended for their speed and accuracy"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023). Databricks supports Whisper integration in its MLflow or Lakehouse workflows.
Conclusion: OnlyD. whisper-large-v3is a speech-to-text model, making it the sole suitable choice. Its design prioritizes transcription, and its efficiency (e.g., via optimized inference) meets the speed requirement, aligning with Databricks' model deployment best practices.


NEW QUESTION # 59
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with developing a RAG application that will help a small internal group of experts at their company answer specific questions, augmented by an internal knowledge base. They want the best possible quality in the answers, and neither latency nor throughput is a huge concern given that the user group is small and they're willing to wait for the best answer. The topics are sensitive in nature and the data is highly confidential and so, due to regulatory requirements, none of the information is allowed to be transmitted to third parties.
Which model meets all the Generative Al Engineer's needs in this situation?

  • A. Llama2-70B
  • B. BGE-large
  • C. Dolly 1.5B
  • D. OpenAI GPT-4

Answer: B

Explanation:
Problem Context: The Generative AI Engineer needs a model for a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application that provides high-quality answers, where latency and throughput are not major concerns. The key factors areconfidentialityandsensitivityof the data, as well as the requirement for all processing to be confined to internal resources without external data transmission.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Dolly 1.5B: This model does not typically support RAG applications as it's more focused on image generation tasks.
* Option B: OpenAI GPT-4: While GPT-4 is powerful for generating responses, its standard deployment involves cloud-based processing, which could violate the confidentiality requirements due to external data transmission.
* Option C: BGE-large: The BGE (Big Green Engine) large model is a suitable choice if it is configured to operate on-premises or within a secure internal environment that meets regulatory requirements.
Assuming this setup, BGE-large can provide high-quality answers while ensuring that data is not transmitted to third parties, thus aligning with the project's sensitivity and confidentiality needs.
* Option D: Llama2-70B: Similar to GPT-4, unless specifically set up for on-premises use, it generally relies on cloud-based services, which might risk confidential data exposure.
Given the sensitivity and confidentiality concerns,BGE-largeis assumed to be configurable for secure internal use, making it the optimal choice for this scenario.


NEW QUESTION # 60
......

The experts in our company have been focusing on the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate examination for a long time and they never overlook any new knowledge. The content of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials has always been kept up to date. We will inform you by E-mail when we have a new version. With our great efforts, our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associatepractice dumps have been narrowed down and targeted to the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate examination. We can ensure you a pass rate as high as 99%!

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Assessment: https://www.testpassking.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-exam-testking-pass.html

Doing them you can perfect your skills of answering all sorts of Generative AI Engineer a Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate study question and pass exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate in first try, Databricks Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide We update our product frequently so our customer can always have the latest version of the brain dumps, Databricks Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide Perhaps it was because of the work that there was not enough time to learn, or because the lack of the right method of learning led to a lot of time still failing to pass the exam, The good news is that our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam braindumps can help you pass the exam and achieve the certification withe the least time and efforts.

Use the Call Over Wi-Fi Calling Feature, The goals Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Assessment of this section are: Understanding what to measure to evaluate your success in acquiring customers, Doing them you can perfect your skills of answering all sorts of Generative AI Engineer a Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate study question and pass exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate in first try.

Quiz Newest Databricks - Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide

We update our product frequently so our customer Valid Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Blueprint can always have the latest version of the brain dumps, Perhaps it was because of the work that there was not enough time to learn, or because Valid Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Blueprint the lack of the right method of learning led to a lot of time still failing to pass the exam.

The good news is that our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam braindumps can help you pass the exam and achieve the certification withe the least time and efforts, In addition, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps contain both questions and answers, and they also cover Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate most of knowledge points for the exam, and you can improve your professional knowledge as well as pass the exam.

Report this page